myrrph
VIP Member
trying to figure out how to change my nick :P
Posts: 1,075 
Likes: 1,232
|
Post by myrrph on Sept 1, 2014 12:31:40 GMT 10
|
|
|
|
Post by You Must Enter A Name on Sept 1, 2014 12:42:20 GMT 10
Interesting read mate, I don't think "grim" cuts it though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2014 14:15:50 GMT 10
At the end of point 2:
with emissions "falling towards zero or below" by 2100.
|
|
malewithatail
VIP Member
Posts: 3,963
Likes: 1,380
Location: Northern Rivers NSW
|
Post by malewithatail on Oct 29, 2022 7:54:39 GMT 10
Cold change forecast for the southern areas in the next few days. SNOW, yes snow forecast, in November ! Must be global warming......
Definition of democracy 2: the illusion of freedom.
|
|
bce1
Ausprep Staff 
Posts: 819
Likes: 1,581
|
Post by bce1 on Oct 29, 2022 8:36:59 GMT 10
I had never understood how there could be worse cold weather events when the trend was for temperatures rising until a couple of years ago when I saw a meteorologist speak….
He said the best way to understand this is the rising temperature puts more energy into weather systems. More energy makes it more unstable and more instability causes more extreme weather at both ends of the spectrum.
There is nothing incompatible with more severe cold weather events and global warming!!
|
|
bug
Senior Member
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 1,934
|
Post by bug on Oct 29, 2022 8:53:36 GMT 10
We have massively damaged the planet. Climate change deniers may eventually be shown to be right about some of the climate change predictions being inaccurate. But to fob off what is clearly immense environmental damage and change in the composition of the atmosphere is arrogant and downright selfish. Every single time, it's someone who wants to keep their polluting vehicle or making no change to their environmentally destructive lifestyle, not caring in the slightest about the effects it will have on their grandchildren.
|
|
frostbite
VIP Member
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 7,119
|
Post by frostbite on Oct 29, 2022 9:47:35 GMT 10
I read last week that a bushfire in California contributed more to global warming than 18 years of human activity. Imagine what a volcanic eruption would contribute.
Perhaps the real culprit here is Mother Nature. Let's vilify her instead.
|
|
Morgo
Senior Member
Posts: 682
Likes: 662
|
Post by Morgo on Oct 29, 2022 14:10:15 GMT 10
Climate change deniers may eventually be shown to be right about some of the climate change predictions being inaccurate. lol, understatement much. |
|
bug
Senior Member
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 1,934
|
Post by bug on Oct 29, 2022 15:26:09 GMT 10
Climate change deniers may eventually be shown to be right about some of the climate change predictions being inaccurate. lol, understatement much. Quoting out of context. Nice. |
|
Morgo
Senior Member
Posts: 682
Likes: 662
|
Post by Morgo on Oct 29, 2022 17:36:04 GMT 10
lol, understatement much. Quoting out of context. Nice. Haha, all the context needed is in your statement. |
|
bushdoc2
Senior Member
Posts: 381
Likes: 469
|
Post by bushdoc2 on Oct 29, 2022 21:52:53 GMT 10
We have massively damaged the planet. Climate change deniers may eventually be shown to be right about some of the climate change predictions being inaccurate. But to fob off what is clearly immense environmental damage and change in the composition of the atmosphere is arrogant and downright selfish. Every single time, it's someone who wants to keep their polluting vehicle or making no change to their environmentally destructive lifestyle, not caring in the slightest about the effects it will have on their grandchildren. Happy to do my bit for the environment. But it's like donating to charity: How much of what I do, pay or surrender, actually helps the environment of frontline charity? How much is just siphoned off to vested interests, eg. electric vehicle manufacturers getting subsidised?
How much farmland is acquired by environmentally-driven lawsuits, only to see its just "The Castle" all over again?
I'm not anti-environment, but I reserve the right not to believe at face value everything I am told. Interesting to see how many environmental activists are anti-vaxers, because they don't trust the system, but they expect me to do so when they force laws and taxes on my life and my grandkids.
F8ck it, I'm on another watchlist.
|
|
malewithatail
VIP Member
Posts: 3,963
Likes: 1,380
Location: Northern Rivers NSW
|
Post by malewithatail on Oct 30, 2022 7:23:19 GMT 10
And how about the burning of wood, cardboard and other stuff in Germany etc as there is no gas to heat their houses ? Very green.
There's a difference between destroying the planet and using the resources, and the elite are destroying it, whilst some of us are trying to be conservative of the resources we use. Wood, for heating and fuel, is a 100% renewable resource.
And the materials used, water etc in making solar panels means that they have to generate power for something like 20 years to make up for the energy input. Its still worth while to invest in alternative power generation means as the cost to run commercial electric lines to every property would be horrendous, and besides, its nice to be independent of at least one or two systems, like water and power.
Answer ? Direct mass to energy conversion. All we have to do is work out how to release the almost infinite amount of energy in matter, without a nuclear reactor being needed. Lots are working on technology like cold fusion, and it will be cracked eventually.
A woke definition...A circle is a shape with four equal straight sides and four straight angles.
|
|
frostbite
VIP Member
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 7,119
|
Post by frostbite on Oct 30, 2022 8:22:10 GMT 10
The answer to climate change is less people. Several hundred million less Europeans would be a good start 😁
|
|
malewithatail
VIP Member
Posts: 3,963
Likes: 1,380
Location: Northern Rivers NSW
|
Post by malewithatail on Oct 30, 2022 8:24:41 GMT 10
Thats the aim of Davros, Bill Gates and the jabs. Get the worlds population to 500 million or so. A billion or so down, 3.5 billion to go.
Since nobody knows who invented bitcoin. Is it possible it was the government slowly implementing a virtual currency to control our every financial moves?
|
|
frostbite
VIP Member
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 7,119
|
Post by frostbite on Oct 30, 2022 9:08:14 GMT 10
Thats the aim of Davros, Bill Gates and the jabs. Get the worlds population to 500 million or so. A billion or so down, 3.5 billion to go. Since nobody knows who invented bitcoin. Is it possible it was the government slowly implementing a virtual currency to control our every financial moves? . World population keeps increasing |
|
|
|
Post by Joey on Oct 30, 2022 9:15:56 GMT 10
Thats the aim of Davros, Bill Gates and the jabs. Get the worlds population to 500 million or so. A billion or so down, 3.5 billion to go. Since nobody knows who invented bitcoin. Is it possible it was the government slowly implementing a virtual currency to control our every financial moves? I crunched the number on their population spread with the numbers they wanted the world population reduced to as stated in the 1992 UN summit in Rio, and worked out for an even spread of the population across every country and divided down into the states of Aust, each state would be limited to the total population of Central Mackay, roughly 35,000 in the entire states/territories of Aust. The answer to climate change is less people. Several hundred million less Europeans * would be a good start 😁 Except Vietnamese backpackers |
|
bug
Senior Member
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 1,934
|
Post by bug on Oct 30, 2022 10:26:20 GMT 10
Quoting out of context. Nice. Haha, all the context needed is in your statement. Which you didn't quote. Hence it is quoting out of context. |
|
bug
Senior Member
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 1,934
|
Post by bug on Oct 30, 2022 10:28:21 GMT 10
And how about the burning of wood, cardboard and other stuff in Germany etc as there is no gas to heat their houses ? Very green. There's a difference between destroying the planet and using the resources, and the elite are destroying it, whilst some of us are trying to be conservative of the resources we use. Wood, for heating and fuel, is a 100% renewable resource. And the materials used, water etc in making solar panels means that they have to generate power for something like 20 years to make up for the energy input. Its still worth while to invest in alternative power generation means as the cost to run commercial electric lines to every property would be horrendous, and besides, its nice to be independent of at least one or two systems, like water and power. Answer ? Direct mass to energy conversion. All we have to do is work out how to release the almost infinite amount of energy in matter, without a nuclear reactor being needed. Lots are working on technology like cold fusion, and it will be cracked eventually. A woke definition...A circle is a shape with four equal straight sides and four straight angles. I quite like the burning of cardboard wood etc in cities. Those causing the pollution should be the ones suffering from its effects. Not in some power plant a large distance away that the energy user can pretend doesn't exist. |
|
Morgo
Senior Member
Posts: 682
Likes: 662
|
Post by Morgo on Oct 30, 2022 10:40:06 GMT 10
|
|
bug
Senior Member
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 1,934
|
Post by bug on Oct 30, 2022 16:00:57 GMT 10
The context I wrote it in was that *some* of the predictions may prove be incorrect, but that overall it would be arrogant to ignore the rest. And it looks like my post was proven correct very quickly. |
|
Jul 7, 2024 11:02:41 GMT 10
Jul 7, 2024 11:02:41 GMT 10
