spatial
Senior Member
Posts: 2,396
Likes: 1,560
|
Post by spatial on Mar 3, 2024 19:58:18 GMT 10
Just gets better and better. Both indoor ranges in Perth temporarily closes lead contamination of surrounding environment, storage issues, range upgrades depending on who you listen to. One has 850 members how many of them are going to be able to meet their yearly attendance requirements. At the local pistol club this morning, 3 member emailed a local member of parliament voicing their concerns. No response from the local member but all 3 had visits from local police for storage checks.Just a coincidence of course. This is getting serious, the other states will follow all the woke doctrine going around.
|
|
bug
Senior Member
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 1,934
Member is Online
|
Post by bug on Mar 4, 2024 7:00:28 GMT 10
Yip, NO one talking about human hunting requirements. well over the last few years they have been relentless publishing minimum calibre for humane game hunting. So for each class of animal you need the correct caliber. For example shooting roos with .223 is acceptable but if you want to deal with a pig problem you need something more powerful. The premises being the smaller the caliber used the better for cost, noise and safety.. I was considering getting .338 for water buffalo as that is what is recommended, the humble .308 is not up to the task according to minimum humane hunting requirements. .338 are banned from most ranges and would be banned in WA.. newzealandsafaris.com/shot-placement-for-australian-water-buffalo/#:~:text=To%20make%20an%20ethical%20shot,338. To make an ethical shot on an Australian Water Buffalo Bull it is recommended to use a minimum of .375 caliber although some hunters may use a .338. On our Australian Water Buffalo hunts we have seen that the .338 caliber is moving much too quickly to achieve maximum expansion of projectile which should be bonded, or, first shot even a solid but this can be left to the experts to discuss in depth. What can you hunt (includes recommended caliber) This section presents some of the most common species that can be legally hunted in Australia. Most are classified as feral or pest animals and can be hunted any time. www.ssaa.org.au/resources/hunting/what-you-can-hunt/The .308 and 303 have taken more buff than .338 rounds have ever been fired in oz. 303 during the hide trade of the 20s and 30s. Then the .308 during BTEC in the 80s. But of course, back then men were men and magnums were but a penis compensator. My personal experience is that .308 is perfect for taking feral bulls … of the Santa size … because accurate shooting is much easier with that calibre. In much the same vein … the hilux will do way more for you than a Dodge Ram or F250. Off topic, but those farking pickup trucks are everywhere now and they are useless and dangerous. You'll often see one towing a motorbike on a trailer, that would have been easily mounted on a 20 year old hilux single cab. So they can't even do the basic tasks of a ute. They are no good off road either as they don't fit down many 4WD tracks. They appear to operate very effectively as w anchor magnets at car dealerships though. On topic, if that issue with the .338 is real then it is insane. There are plenty bigger calibres out there for buffalo (nitro express etc), so what of those? Ban them too?
|
|
malewithatail
VIP Member
Posts: 3,963
Likes: 1,380
Location: Northern Rivers NSW
|
Post by malewithatail on Mar 4, 2024 7:14:18 GMT 10
All part of the plan to disarm the population.
Best cure for insomnia is lots of sleep.
|
|
bushdoc2
Senior Member
Posts: 381
Likes: 469
|
Post by bushdoc2 on Mar 13, 2024 14:52:10 GMT 10
Fun fact: did you know that if you are under 16 you cannot buy a knife from woolworths For "safety" reasons. LOL!!!!
Got to the self checkout and couldn't go any further because I had to provide ID for the BLUNT KNIFE 🤣🤣🤣. I was stunned! When the lass came to buzz it through, I said to her "You could do more damage with a plastic knife than this, why do I need ID for it?" and she just sighed heavily and said "You tell me and we'll both know". I still giggle about that little piece of red tape idiocy even now. Genuine question though, for what reason would it be sensible to own ten as a primary producer? Unless I'm missing something, you can only shoot one at a time. Is it so that you can provide equipment for shooters coming onto your land? I'd have thought most shooters would have their own kit and prefer to use that regardless. I guess I could see a reduced reload timeframe being valuable if you already have a few firearms loaded and ready to go but even then, it seems overkill. Happy to be cleared up on that one, I've not been a primary producer before and for all that we went spotlighting a lot when I was a kid for local farms, there was never more than one per shooter and not because there weren't options, it was just the preference. 1. woollies etc is not allowed to sell more than 20 tabs per box of paracetamol. They will cheerfully sell you several boxes, though.... 2. Number of guns is not an issue: you have 1 pair of hands, and owning more does not make you more dangerous. Tiger Woods probably has more than 1 set of golf clubs, but nobody demands he shows a reason.
How many cars do you need on a farm/elsewhere? Drive one at a time...show cause? It's just another angle they use to control guns and gun owners.
|
|
malewithatail
VIP Member
Posts: 3,963
Likes: 1,380
Location: Northern Rivers NSW
|
Post by malewithatail on Mar 13, 2024 16:33:39 GMT 10
Lets see, 10 guns, all .22 to make it easier.
1 - A remington 2 - Browning 3 - Lithgow 4 - Stirling 5 - Gelco 6 - Ruger 7 - Hunter 8 - Winchester 9 - Daisy 10 - Sportco
And hundreds more, so 10 is probably not too many if you are at all interested in guns.
It doesn't work, but looks pretty.
|
|
hd1340
Senior Member
Posts: 334
Likes: 426
Location: WA
|
Post by hd1340 on Mar 13, 2024 20:59:33 GMT 10
Statement by a Liberal MP(missed his name)on 7 news tonight "We won't oppose restricting gun ownership to 5 firearms, we want to get ILLEGAL FIREARMS off the street".
Aditionally Liberal MP Merome Beard said she would support the Nationals opposition to firearms reform. Going to be very interesting.
|
|
malewithatail
VIP Member
Posts: 3,963
Likes: 1,380
Location: Northern Rivers NSW
|
Post by malewithatail on Mar 14, 2024 7:26:34 GMT 10
How can restricting ownership to 5 reduce the illegal guns on the street ? Somebody should ask these jerks to show the link.
Its bad luck to be superstitious.
|
|
spatial
Senior Member
Posts: 2,396
Likes: 1,560
|
Post by spatial on Mar 14, 2024 9:25:28 GMT 10
How can restricting ownership to 5 reduce the illegal guns on the street ? Somebody should ask these jerks to show the link. Its bad luck to be superstitious. If someone breaks into you house and steals the firearms they only get 5 instead of 200. ??!!!~~!!~... The illegal's importers send entire shipping containers of guns at a time into the country - that is where the real illegal guns are coming from. For me all new purchase have been putting them other family members license. So total firearm's held on site will not change.
|
|
malewithatail
VIP Member
Posts: 3,963
Likes: 1,380
Location: Northern Rivers NSW
|
Post by malewithatail on Mar 14, 2024 9:49:38 GMT 10
Same here, 5 out of the 11 of us have appropriate licenses. And transferring the weapons over into those names is just paperwork.
Anyway, there are still so many weapons in farmers hands that were not handed in, semi autos as well its amazing. Add to that the person who discovers their grandfathers old 12 g double barrel in the wardrobe that's 80 + years old and they haven't a hope.
It better to be brief than boring.
|
|
|
Post by Stealth on Mar 14, 2024 11:54:37 GMT 10
How can restricting ownership to 5 reduce the illegal guns on the street ? Somebody should ask these jerks to show the link. I mean, I can give you a direct, lived experience if that's what you're looking for. It's all well and good to have ten firearms in your home, but one break in on a rural property where they're a bit relaxed about their security and suddenly that's 10 uncontrolled weapons in the environment. I had an ex do that many, many years ago. Guess how much longer we were together after I found out about his larceny. I'll give you the hot tip, it was about three seconds and a 'gtfo of my house and I never want to see you again' heh. I don't know what the outcome was for him but I DO know that he was caught because he had to get a lawyer to fight the charges. Or at least, his parents did. Pretty sure it was all pinned on his brother because it was 'his brother's idea'. Pffft. Anyway. Booted him out and the next day I had the cops at the door asking for him. Couldn't tell them where he was because tbh I didn't care and told them as such. Didn't find out the full scale of what they'd been up to and probably never will but I don't have contact anymore for good reason so it's not a me problem. But my point is, before I knew what was going on (in hindsight I should have realised but I was fairly young and innocent) he was talking with his brother in front of me about how many farmers in their area leave their gunsafes open and keep all the ammo in one place which is also not locked up. Apparently they all gossiped about it to each other at the pub in the afternoon, full of piss and vinegar and ranting about their one local cop who was just doing his job with inspections. Obviously it wasn't hard for one guy to figure out exactly how many places he could hit up and knock off in one afternoon. I heard five from one guy alone. Now I realise that no one here is stupid enough to telegraph like that in public where others can hear. But the folks in this forum are a very small microcosm of the gun owning population. The average punter is unfortunately not quite that savvy. In one tiny Victorian town they gave up enough info in one sitting for one person to roll up thousands worth of guns that are then free for black market sale. But another thing to keep in mind is that my ex absolutely was not a career criminal. He was a stupid, fairly young guy who's even stupider and younger brother had a REALLY stupid idea and they both ran with the stupid. Career criminals aren't going to be so stupid as to steal guns in a town where they're well known and easily recognisable as the only person that's been through in the last month when things suddenly start going missing. Apparently all the old and bolds keep their safes well locked and side eye anyone before talking about guns anymore 😅. But illegal guns and the danger involved in their existence is not just a made up story to keep the civilians in line and undefended. These kind of thefts do happen. The way I look at it is that it's a very fine line between having the tools you need to do the job, and the tools you want to satisfy your own tool (is that indelicate? that might be indelicate... hahahaha). I don't envy the people trying to work out where that line is because there's valid reasons to have more and there's valid reasons to have less. I can see both sides of the argument for this topic.
|
|
frostbite
VIP Member
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 7,119
|
Post by frostbite on Mar 14, 2024 14:25:31 GMT 10
My opinion is the government should focus more on safe storage and less on how many guns a person has. Give the cops dedicated resources to actually do safe inspections, and make sure those cops actually understand firearms regulations, because many of them don’t. If a gun owner isn’t prepared to ensure his guns are safely stored, pull his licence. He/she is too stupid to have a gun. I teach my trainees to go above and beyond the legal requirement, as I do. For example, at the range any handgun not in use is in a padlocked pelican case that is secured to a steel pole with a steel cable. Unfortunately a lot of other licence holders don’t do the same. Some even leave their guns outside the office, unattended, whilst they sign into the range.
|
|
|
Post by Stealth on Mar 14, 2024 16:12:08 GMT 10
Yeah you make very good points there. Idiot ex wouldn't have been able to do what he did if he didn't hear the olds gobbing off a the bar and then take advantage of their lack of personal security. I'm obviously pretty knee-jerk on securing your weapon but it's the folks who aren't that are the problem.
|
|
frostbite
VIP Member
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 7,119
|
Post by frostbite on Mar 14, 2024 18:04:46 GMT 10
As a civi you should refer to them as firearms, not weapons.
|
|
|
Post by Stealth on Mar 14, 2024 18:56:21 GMT 10
Noted 🤣🤣🤣
|
|
bug
Senior Member
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 1,934
Member is Online
|
Post by bug on Mar 14, 2024 19:05:42 GMT 10
Currently 2-5% of shipping containers are inspected. That's a pretty good risk proposition for organised crime.
|
|
bug
Senior Member
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 1,934
Member is Online
|
Post by bug on Mar 14, 2024 19:10:22 GMT 10
How can restricting ownership to 5 reduce the illegal guns on the street ? Somebody should ask these jerks to show the link. I mean, I can give you a direct, lived experience if that's what you're looking for. It's all well and good to have ten firearms in your home, but one break in on a rural property where they're a bit relaxed about their security and suddenly that's 10 uncontrolled weapons in the environment. I had an ex do that many, many years ago. Guess how much longer we were together after I found out about his larceny. I'll give you the hot tip, it was about three seconds and a 'gtfo of my house and I never want to see you again' heh. I don't know what the outcome was for him but I DO know that he was caught because he had to get a lawyer to fight the charges. Or at least, his parents did. Pretty sure it was all pinned on his brother because it was 'his brother's idea'. Pffft. Anyway. Booted him out and the next day I had the cops at the door asking for him. Couldn't tell them where he was because tbh I didn't care and told them as such. Didn't find out the full scale of what they'd been up to and probably never will but I don't have contact anymore for good reason so it's not a me problem. But my point is, before I knew what was going on (in hindsight I should have realised but I was fairly young and innocent) he was talking with his brother in front of me about how many farmers in their area leave their gunsafes open and keep all the ammo in one place which is also not locked up. Apparently they all gossiped about it to each other at the pub in the afternoon, full of piss and vinegar and ranting about their one local cop who was just doing his job with inspections. Obviously it wasn't hard for one guy to figure out exactly how many places he could hit up and knock off in one afternoon. I heard five from one guy alone. Now I realise that no one here is stupid enough to telegraph like that in public where others can hear. But the folks in this forum are a very small microcosm of the gun owning population. The average punter is unfortunately not quite that savvy. In one tiny Victorian town they gave up enough info in one sitting for one person to roll up thousands worth of guns that are then free for black market sale. But another thing to keep in mind is that my ex absolutely was not a career criminal. He was a stupid, fairly young guy who's even stupider and younger brother had a REALLY stupid idea and they both ran with the stupid. Career criminals aren't going to be so stupid as to steal guns in a town where they're well known and easily recognisable as the only person that's been through in the last month when things suddenly start going missing. Apparently all the old and bolds keep their safes well locked and side eye anyone before talking about guns anymore 😅. But illegal guns and the danger involved in their existence is not just a made up story to keep the civilians in line and undefended. These kind of thefts do happen. The way I look at it is that it's a very fine line between having the tools you need to do the job, and the tools you want to satisfy your own tool (is that indelicate? that might be indelicate... hahahaha). I don't envy the people trying to work out where that line is because there's valid reasons to have more and there's valid reasons to have less. I can see both sides of the argument for this topic. Look, your point is valid. But to restrict ownership on the basis of that kind of thing is victim blaming. The very obvious and well known issue is that courts are consistently too soft on crime. Scumbags have a lot of trouble stealing guns when they are in jail.
|
|
bushdoc2
Senior Member
Posts: 381
Likes: 469
|
Post by bushdoc2 on Mar 24, 2024 16:00:06 GMT 10
How can restricting ownership to 5 reduce the illegal guns on the street ? Somebody should ask these jerks to show the link. Its bad luck to be superstitious. If someone breaks into you house and steals the firearms they only get 5 instead of 200. ??!!!~~!!~... The illegal's importers send entire shipping containers of guns at a time into the country - that is where the real illegal guns are coming from. For me all new purchase have been putting them other family members license. So total firearm's held on site will not change. All the more reason not to have registration, as I have been accidentally given the name and address of a Brisbane resident who had a collection worth stealing. I would never have had this info if the WLB in Qld hadn't stuffed up. Imagine how many corrupt/illegal releases of such info happen when the cops' bikie mates ask for it
|
|