norseman
VIP Member
Posts: 2,237
Likes: 1,888
|
Post by norseman on Aug 30, 2024 11:43:57 GMT 10
It's all totally fugged now! I just found out today via the internet that Russia is now taking asylum seekers from Western Countries and that a Canadian Family of ten were recently accepted! What do you reckon Norseman, we get some khaki shorts and shirts, some old school webbing, an SLR or two and head over to Russia to help with their Ukrainian problem? We can call ourselves the Overselous Scouts. "Overselous Scouts" I'm gonna frame that and keep it on the wall!
|
|
spatial
Senior Member
Posts: 2,396
Likes: 1,560
|
Europe?
Aug 30, 2024 12:07:41 GMT 10
Post by spatial on Aug 30, 2024 12:07:41 GMT 10
Brazil has now entered the kill all freedom of speech. NWO on the way - can eerily see how the totally corrupt world governments will end up working together. Freezing a lawyers bank accounts after she resigned from the case!! Read a YT comment the other day, was something like this . " You can vote communist's into power but not out, have to shoot your way out". We are now into the weeks where decades happen: Lenin’s quote, “There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen.” X and Trump are the ones now in the firing line of the NWO. X Warns Of Brazil Shutdown 'Soon' For Defying Judge's "Illegal Orders To Censor Political Opponents"www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/brazils-darth-vader-blocks-starlink-bank-accounts-war-elon-musk-escalatesOn Thursday night, X's Global Government Affairs account posted a dire warning over service availability in Brazil, after dictatorial Supreme Court Judge Alexandre de Moraes punished them for not complying "with his illegal orders to censor his political opponents," according to the post. When we attempted to defend ourselves in court, Judge de Moraes threatened our Brazilian legal representative with imprisonment. Even after she resigned, he froze all of her bank accounts. Our challenges against his manifestly illegal actions were either dismissed or ignored. Judge de Moraes’ colleagues on the Supreme Court are either unwilling or unable to stand up to him. We are absolutely not insisting that other countries have the same free speech laws as the United States. The fundamental issue at stake here is that Judge de Moraes demands we break Brazil’s own laws. We simply won’t do that. In the days to come, we will publish all of Judge de Moraes’ illegal demands and all related court filings in the interest of transparency.
|
|
Beno
Senior Member
Posts: 1,310
Likes: 1,433
Location: Northern Rivers
|
Europe?
Aug 30, 2024 13:35:56 GMT 10
Post by Beno on Aug 30, 2024 13:35:56 GMT 10
Even though it is against my nature to care about a lawyer's loss, this is pretty bad for everyone else. I love the communist quote.
|
|
bug
Senior Member
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 1,934
|
Europe?
Aug 30, 2024 14:25:47 GMT 10
Post by bug on Aug 30, 2024 14:25:47 GMT 10
It's all totally fugged now! I just found out today via the internet that Russia is now taking asylum seekers from Western Countries and that a Canadian Family of ten were recently accepted! For a traditional Christian family, this would make sense. It has gotten to the stage where Christians are being persecuted in many western countries. In Russia, being a devout Christian often aligns you as a nationalist, so the move may be beneficial for some, particularly those with orthodox/eastern european heritage.
|
|
|
Europe?
Sept 4, 2024 18:08:29 GMT 10
Post by SA Hunter on Sept 4, 2024 18:08:29 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by Stealth on Sept 4, 2024 22:55:13 GMT 10
Ugh... I'm of two minds on that one.
The first is "I don't care if you want me to refer to you as a pot plant, if that's what makes you happy then fine. Literally does nothing to my life, and you're not trying to get into MY bed so idgaf!".
The second is, IT'S A CHRISTIAN SCHOOL. What did they expect? Sending your transgender kid to a religious school (of ANY of the major religions) is statistically a poor life choice. What did they think was going to happen? None of those faiths are known for tolerance of anything beyond the standard family cell, so having a child who represents everything that they're intolerant of and putting them into that position of weakness and disadvantage is frankly a hectically irresponsible choice.
That being said I'm not convinced this was a case of a religious person being persecuted and standing up for his rights. He's actively returning to the school that he's been fired from more than once. What does he expect to achieve? He's either stalking a specific child (this is a school, keep in mind he's intimidating children as well as the staff) or in what I suspect is more likely, he's causing a scene every time he rocks up. Which again, would be intimidating innocent children. It feels like the whole story isn't here.
No stable, regular individual who was unfairly sacked rocks up at their old workplace after an injunction demanding that they stay away is ordered, and then copping jail time when you broke the rules the first time. You go on to fight it in a place that could actually make a difference. Specifically the courts, where in a largely Christian nation you're likely to have at least semi-decent results if you present in a rational, sensible way. Even if your views aren't entirely mainstream, if you're being logical and reasonable about your assertions, the right to religious freedom is generally taken pretty seriously if you're a Christian in a primarily Christian country.
Old mate showed back up lurking around and whether he actively caused a scene or not, his intent is clearly to intimidate and disrupt in a setting where the majority of people in attendance are minors. That sets my teeth on edge in a very specific way. Fight the good fight. You're entitled to your religious beliefs. You are NOT entitled to harass or intimidate others on the basis of your beliefs. That ain't cool.
|
|
bug
Senior Member
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 1,934
|
Post by bug on Sept 5, 2024 7:21:59 GMT 10
He was jailed for going to the school after being given a court order not to. He was fired for refusing to allow his religious beleifs to be compromised. He should not have been fired for this, but it's not what got him jailed.
|
|
bug
Senior Member
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 1,934
|
Post by bug on Sept 5, 2024 7:30:43 GMT 10
Ugh... I'm of two minds on that one. The first is "I don't care if you want me to refer to you as a pot plant, if that's what makes you happy then fine. Literally does nothing to my life, and you're not trying to get into MY bed so idgaf!".
The second is, IT'S A CHRISTIAN SCHOOL. What did they expect? Sending your transgender kid to a religious school (of ANY of the major religions) is statistically a poor life choice. What did they think was going to happen? None of those faiths are known for tolerance of anything beyond the standard family cell, so having a child who represents everything that they're intolerant of and putting them into that position of weakness and disadvantage is frankly a hectically irresponsible choice. That being said I'm not convinced this was a case of a religious person being persecuted and standing up for his rights. He's actively returning to the school that he's been fired from more than once. What does he expect to achieve? He's either stalking a specific child (this is a school, keep in mind he's intimidating children as well as the staff) or in what I suspect is more likely, he's causing a scene every time he rocks up. Which again, would be intimidating innocent children. It feels like the whole story isn't here. No stable, regular individual who was unfairly sacked rocks up at their old workplace after an injunction demanding that they stay away is ordered, and then copping jail time when you broke the rules the first time. You go on to fight it in a place that could actually make a difference. Specifically the courts, where in a largely Christian nation you're likely to have at least semi-decent results if you present in a rational, sensible way. Even if your views aren't entirely mainstream, if you're being logical and reasonable about your assertions, the right to religious freedom is generally taken pretty seriously if you're a Christian in a primarily Christian country. Old mate showed back up lurking around and whether he actively caused a scene or not, his intent is clearly to intimidate and disrupt in a setting where the majority of people in attendance are minors. That sets my teeth on edge in a very specific way. Fight the good fight. You're entitled to your religious beliefs. You are NOT entitled to harass or intimidate others on the basis of your beliefs. That ain't cool. He's clearly doing it for publicity and has succeeded. The sad thing is, that if even if he is successful in his appeal over the firing, he would likely still be denied the job due to now having a criminal record and has ruined his career.
|
|