remnantprep
Senior Member
People do not exist for the sake of governments!
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 3,968
Email: remnant@ausprep.org
|
Post by remnantprep on Jul 22, 2014 13:24:15 GMT 10
|
|
Frank
VIP Member
APF Life Member
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 2,739
Email: frank@ausprep.com
|
Post by Frank on Jul 22, 2014 13:36:21 GMT 10
Just read that article aswell (busy day at work...) Pretty scary if that is result of only a "limited" nuclear strike using bombs the same strength as Hiroshima. Although I am not sure if I would call 100 detonations limited haha
|
|
remnantprep
Senior Member
People do not exist for the sake of governments!
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 3,968
Email: remnant@ausprep.org
|
Post by remnantprep on Jul 22, 2014 13:39:02 GMT 10
I guess 100 in comparison to how many there actually are in the world!
|
|
|
Post by pheniox17 on Jul 22, 2014 14:05:04 GMT 10
2 billion?? That's a little optamistic If crops fail to the degree that's suggested it will be a lot worse, and low rain fall.... Its like they have gone "what's best case" don't wanna tell the world more than 80% of the population would be dead over that cold war... So let's pick a figure that will alarm but not freak people out, and we all know how good those climate change models are
|
|
|
Post by StepfordRenegade on Jul 22, 2014 14:06:37 GMT 10
Far out :/
|
|
remnantprep
Senior Member
People do not exist for the sake of governments!
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 3,968
Email: remnant@ausprep.org
|
Post by remnantprep on Jul 22, 2014 14:11:57 GMT 10
Have watched Threads and The Road!
|
|
|
Post by pheniox17 on Jul 22, 2014 14:47:16 GMT 10
Chatting to Mrs pheniox, these casualty predictions are a gross underestimate, the population of India is just over 1 billion, no idea about Pakistan, but be more than 500 million
|
|
|
Post by You Must Enter A Name on Jul 22, 2014 15:13:04 GMT 10
that's bloody crazy, "if you see the flash, it's already too late"
|
|
overlord
Senior Member
Posts: 614
Likes: 720
|
Post by overlord on Jul 22, 2014 18:49:37 GMT 10
With the equivalent of 100 Hiroshima bombs, that is such a small example maybe like an accident. Nuclear bombs/missiles carry more than that nowadays.
The snowball effect is the scary part because the damage would be worldwide and would be continuous. The wind currents would carry the fallout to the other parts of the world causing long term effects on people, livestock, and plants.
|
|
myrrph
VIP Member
trying to figure out how to change my nick :P
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 1,232
|
Post by myrrph on Jul 22, 2014 19:02:32 GMT 10
i think 2 billion is the on set of the nuclear spat.
Those are the lucky ones.
|
|
AKM.
Senior Member
Posts: 146
Likes: 295
|
Post by AKM. on Jul 23, 2014 0:38:07 GMT 10
The possibility of a nuke war is what first got me interested in survivalism back in the early 80's. Everyone I spoke to said we would all die; it would all be like "On the Beach" Instinctively, I thought Nahhhh.....and started reading/collecting books on it. One of my favorite Aussie books on the subject. "Can Australia survive World War III" by Christopher Forsyth from 1984. I've just about killed my copy from reading it.... Been out of print for a long time....but you might be able to download it here. I Haven't had a heck of a lot to do with e-books, slowly learning more though. severalebooks.com/555661/can-australia-survive-world-war-iii-christopher-forsyth.htmlNot a fan of his 80's new-age bits he throws in- but I found it a well written book(or- it agreed with how I thought at the time of our perceived risks then. ) <edit> If you like the e-book, a few hardcopies are still around second hand. www.abebooks.com/9780727018779/Australia-Survive-World-III-Forsyth-0727018779/plpJeez, that freight looks hefty though...
|
|