krull68
VIP Member
Posts: 535
Likes: 875
|
Post by krull68 on Mar 3, 2015 8:05:00 GMT 10
Sad, I was planning on spending a few hours researching some ideas for the lad.
I can now move on to more profitable endeavour's now.
When one thinks they are the only one who is right, you can guarantee they are almost always wrong.
|
|
arkane
Senior Member
Posts: 172
Likes: 113
|
Post by arkane on Mar 3, 2015 8:26:57 GMT 10
Sad, I was planning on spending a few hours researching some ideas for the lad. I can now move on to more profitable endeavour's now. When one thinks they are the only one who is right, you can guarantee they are almost always wrong. Don't bother I been doing that since 1975 Yes you can move on if you choose
For me a high rise is just one of many viable plans I have, tis an option just one of many To discredit it out of hand and just rely on bug out to the bush plan is narrow minded.
Most people live in a modern world, you know concrete steel cars electricity! What use is all your modern learning if you flee bush and only have dirt rocks and timber to use In a town/city you have a mountain of treasure to salvage and adapt!
|
|
krull68
VIP Member
Posts: 535
Likes: 875
|
Post by krull68 on Mar 3, 2015 12:20:50 GMT 10
You sir, misunderstand my intentions here. I was in no way shape or form discrediting the idea of high rise bug in out of hand, without even giving it a thought.
I had not considered the idea before, thus I was questioning you on the subject, to learn wether it is a viable option or not.
Yes most people are city bound, with modern technology, electricity and the internet, and have never known anything but that.
Many of us on the other hand have experience in bush living, the modern tech that you talk of, is useful for the time being, but it is not an end in and of itself. You thinking that all the bush has to offer is dirt, rocks and timber, is very narrow and might I add, close minded.
Adapt away, but remember, when the supermarkets are empty, you starve, end of story, there is no more. On the other hand, in the bush, there is plenty of treasure to salvage and adapt, plus food of all styles to keep you happy, alive and thriving.
I feel you have arrived here with preconceived ideas of what is what, and what questions mean. This has been somewhat of a large mistake on your part. I would suggest you share your ideas, with explanations if needed, and leave the defensive attitude away from the forum.
|
|
peter1942
Senior Member
Posts: 146
Likes: 267
|
Post by peter1942 on Mar 3, 2015 12:30:46 GMT 10
Not sure that I agree entirely with what arkane is saying and that is probably because we are set up in a rural area.
But, I have worked in the centre of an industrial area in Sydney that was surrounded by factories and warehouses most of which were three to five floors high. Many of the factories had sizable areas of vacant land within their perimeter fences which would be suitable for the growing of food crops and the buildings would be great catchment for rainwater.
There would be some work involved in setting up such areas for habitation and it would have to be a community/communal effort as it could not be achieved on ones own.
High rise living would be another matter. fire would be the greatest threat and we know from history that in times of crisis there are those that just want to destroy regardless of any circumstance.
Depending on when, how and what type of SHTF situation happened would depend on peoples reactions, willingness to work with others and it just may be that the situation just cries out for people with ideas to lead the way, regardless how dumb or outlandish those ideas seem at the present.
There is so much land within the environs of every city and town that could be used for food production that if farmed properly/sustainably there should be no need for the importation of food from rural areas.
|
|
peter1942
Senior Member
Posts: 146
Likes: 267
|
Post by peter1942 on Mar 3, 2015 12:49:45 GMT 10
This is something that I wrote several days ago but never got to post it but it appears relevant to this conversation. Many contributors to sites such as this talk about their bug out plans and vehicles but not about food production and many do not mention families or groups. On one American site a contributor made some very good comments about living off the native wildlife and I believe the comments also hold true here in Australia. There have been a number of posts from people who say that after the SHTF they are going to sling their bug out bag over the shoulder, pick up their armoury and head for the hills to live off the land. This may be possible for only a short period of time in one place as according to the American contributor it takes about 25 square kilometres (she did say 10 square miles but I converted it) of land to sustain one person living off the game from that area. I have thought about this and of the amount of rabbits, kangaroos and game birds in the area we live and if I were to start harvesting them I would, in a relatively short space of time, either wipe them out or drive them to another area. After a period of time, if living off the land was my only means of survival, I would have to move to a new area where there was still game available to harvest. Not only would I have to travel to the new area but I would also have to set up a new camp which would mean another shelter and also the chance of entering an area that may already be occupied by another person or group. For those of you who have not read the book “A Man Called Possum” by Max Jones visit freedomtights.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/a-man-called-possum-by-max-jones/. Possum was a man who lived in and off the bush for some 50 years. Read the book and then have a good think about what it would be like. Within a 60 kilometre radius of our place there are tens of thousands of hectares of forested land that is a mixture of privately owned, national parks, conservation reserves, working forests and state parks as well as tens of thousands of hectares of agricultural land. I have had the opportunity of visiting many areas of that land and I cannot think of any part of it I would be prepared, even tempted, to set up a camp for any duration and attempt to live off that land because of the lack of food and in particular potable water other than what is attached to existing buildings. Today our daytime temperature reached 41 degrees and the only times I ventured outside was early in the morning, at noon and early afternoon to tend to the livestock, in the main checking water, and even though I had a fairly light day I consumed just under three litres of liquids. As I have said there are not many places within 60 kilometres of us where that amount of potable liquid could be obtained from natural sources. To survive in this country for any length of time would take more than what one could carry on their back or even load into a vehicle. I will add that our day ended with a thunderstorm, great thunder and lightning, no rain.
|
|
krull68
VIP Member
Posts: 535
Likes: 875
|
Post by krull68 on Mar 3, 2015 19:11:54 GMT 10
Agree Peter, I for one would like to see a proper discussion for those who are not going to be able to bug out of a city if the shtf. I am very interested in how one would obtain the necessary materials needed to survive, without being seen, followed and done in.
As my plan has always been to be in the country, off any main roads, with a property that looks like it is not worth stopping at, while being defendable, I am keen to get some info here for city people.
|
|
|
Post by Fractus on Mar 3, 2015 19:27:26 GMT 10
I am in what could be good or bad. I am a city fringe dweller. Got enough land to grow my way out of trouble and if it does not happen for a few years I will have the skills to make it happen. I will have a pile of family arrive and some useful supplementary skills. The distance from work and family is walkable although would take a full day. We are too close to a main road and would not be easily defended unless I ahve more firepower. Plus side is water, solid fuel and food. I am theoretically able to bug out but in practice my preparations are for bug in. Not ideal but all I could afford.
|
|
peter1942
Senior Member
Posts: 146
Likes: 267
|
Post by peter1942 on Mar 3, 2015 20:48:43 GMT 10
This discussion brings up several points that are usually overlooked.
The main one is water and the need, perceived or otherwise, to be close to a substantial source of it to survive. In a SHTF situation that lasted for more than three days there would be the distinct possibility that all reticulated water systems would fail and that most of the population who had the means would head for the nearest water body by whatever means was available to them. I am wondering if it would be the best of ideas to be close to one of those sources as immediately after they had quenched their thirst they would be wanting of a meal and if you were there all stocked up . . . . . . . . .
In the area where we live there are families that have been here for several generations and in reality the only water they have is what is collected from their roofs and stored in tanks. For the most part these properties do not appear on maps as being water sources like lakes, rivers or dams so in the most part they would be undetectable unless you were are nearly on top of them.
Over the past few weeks I have been to Melbourne (how do people put up with the traffic on a daily basis?) on two occasions and both times I have used a fairly basic GPS which shows me the water sources such as dams, lakes and water courses along both sides of the roads I travel on but does not show the properties that have an ample supply of tank water.
I have also in the past few days had a conversation about drones with a property owner who has one that he uses to check his stock. Quite an interesting conversation as I did not realise the quality of the cameras that were available to mount on them, how far they could travel or the manoeuvrability of them. It appears that with a well set up drone there is not much on properties that can be hidden and sizable areas of water stand out in the landscape like the proverbial.
Most of Australia 60 or more kilometres from the coasts or major water sources appear to be fairly inhospitable but there have been people living in those regions for many years and many of those have been successful in growing food crops and have a meaningful existence. In a post SHTF situation these appear to me to be some of the last places that the urban dwellers would head to so may be some of the safest places to live.
As regards to surviving in the urban areas there are one hell of a lot of resources inside any urban area and urban dwellers have a vast amount of skills many of which could and would be put to good use in times of a crisis.
The biggest hurdle for people, regardless of where they are or if they have in any way prepared for a SHTF situation is surviving the first days, weeks, months and then I believe getting together in groups/communities because in a situation where society itself has collapsed no man will be able to survive on his or herself.
|
|
arkane
Senior Member
Posts: 172
Likes: 113
|
Post by arkane on Mar 3, 2015 21:30:52 GMT 10
Just as a side note here If a human wants to sustain themselves all it needs to do is go where other humans are and those suckers are so damn easy to find! Most humans leave so much evidence of there existence they are hard not to find!
Most humans have a three meter wide plus permanent track to there location Most occupy a distinctive structure Most of those structures bleed huge amounts of energy Most have energy supplied by fixed transport routes Except for a very few the occupants of these structures take great pride in making these structures stand out from there surroundings
Humans will take the easy path to get resources If resources can be taken from others as an easy method it will be done! Actually growing food during a SHTF event is stupid as in most cases as it is unlikely you will get to consume it! Although growing food later on after the struggle will be essential
If you think you can hide a veggie patch from hungry hordes maybe think again The horde if it is a thousand strong or just a single person has only one thought, food in belly now! The concept of digging planting nurturing and then harvesting is useless to someone with an empty belly now! Those little carrots wont be left to mature, those seed potatoes will get dug up Your cat/dog will just vanish same as your stock in the yard, your chooks will vanish! The more you have growing/breeding the more attention you will get How much attention can you handle and for how long!
Stache your seeds well disperse your stock hide your pets well Sustain yourselves from hidden stores till the hordes have thinned If you have nothing they have nothing to gain from you and you will be ignored!
Just my opinion I have at times left much stuff in my vehicle in rough suburbs un attended and with windows open as my vehicle looked like junk, no one bothered to look for valuables in it!
|
|
krull68
VIP Member
Posts: 535
Likes: 875
|
Post by krull68 on Mar 4, 2015 8:09:20 GMT 10
Correct, leave the replanting for at least 6 months. Have food stocks hidden so the hordes are unaware you have any. camouflage water storage, make your place look uninviting, sit back (hidden of course) and enjoy the popcorn.
|
|
shinester
Senior Member
China's white trash
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 3,578
Email: shiny@ausprep.org
|
Post by shinester on Mar 6, 2015 11:12:09 GMT 10
Water: Great for safety and whilst you can fish and you can have reverse osmosis hand water desalination, you're going to have to go to port at some point and you would want to be anchored in a sheltered bay/area.
High rise: If you have the supplies [food and water], it would work initially, provided your neighbors didn't kick your front door in. I would imagine that few people living in high rises would have tools such as sledges to break down doors and with a little reinforcement, it would be pretty easy to keep people at bay. Of course, people might go from one balcony to another to get to you, or break down a wall. In fact, you would yourself want to have your entrance through a series of apartments so you had some time and space in which to repel attacks. Water in high rises is generally pumped to a tank on the roof and of course would be empty very quickly and would be very hard to resupply because a balcony is no where near enough area for water collection. On smaller buildings you might be able to tap into the downpipes coming from the roof as a source of water.
Heading for the hills: That might have worked when people knew how to feed themselves in the woods and whilst a few people might, the shear number of people would quickly turn it into a desert when it comes to food. Shelter in place with 'some' supplies, tools and support is better than going to a place of no shelter, with a bunch of other people who also have no supplies. If you were to actually find an isolate place [there's some areas in Victoria that have very few people still], then you might fare better perhaps, though typically they're also 4+ hrs drive from a major population center. Better you got to farming communities and areas already self sustaining that might need your manual labor after the tractors are out of fuel.
|
|
krull68
VIP Member
Posts: 535
Likes: 875
|
Post by krull68 on Mar 6, 2015 20:58:47 GMT 10
Trouble is Shine, many farmers are not able to sustain themselves food wise these days either, once upon a time, travel was long and difficult, requiring a level of self sufficiency, but today with cars that can drive long distances easily, self sufficiency has become a lost art for nearly all peoples.
|
|
shinester
Senior Member
China's white trash
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 3,578
Email: shiny@ausprep.org
|
Post by shinester on Mar 7, 2015 8:57:22 GMT 10
Krull68: Yeah man, I hear ya, it's a good point. Perhaps what I should have said was areas that 'have the potential' to be self sufficient, that is grow enough food, have a water supply and so on. I look around where I live and see market gardeners, various food crops and whilst I know they need pumps and water catchment to get the yields they're getting [and petrol for equipment], I see how they're a much better option to sustain life than going to the hills [also near] and scratching a few pieces of meat and very low quality vegetable matter, if you even know how to find it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2015 14:32:32 GMT 10
Until we ourselves are in a SHTF scenario, we really don't have any idea how or what may or may not happen!!!! All we can do is prepare for most scenarios and hope we have done enough.
I have a good base and reasonable supplies but I could be a long way from home when a SHTF scenario happens, with only what I have with me!!!!
So I either put my head between my legs and kiss my Ar.. good buy or I do what I have always done and survive!!!!
This site is about getting prepared and sharing Ideas and information and friendship.... No one is wrong and No one is always right...
(Well except for me and Jinny keeps telling me "I am not..." LMAO)
"Just saying"
|
|
Frank
VIP Member
APF Life Member
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 2,739
Email: frank@ausprep.com
|
Post by Frank on Mar 11, 2015 14:51:43 GMT 10
Well said Dr Gaz!
|
|