Frank
VIP Member
APF Life Member
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 2,739
Email: frank@ausprep.com
|
Post by Frank on Feb 24, 2016 10:12:56 GMT 10
www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-24/fuel-imports-a-risk-amid-south-china-sea-tensions-nrma-advisor/7149648 Defence White Paper 2016: Dependency on fuel imports 'a risk' amid South China Sea tensions With the Government expected to release its latest Defence White Paper on Thursday, an adviser to the country's largest motorist association has said he hopes tensions in the South China Sea have forced a re-think of where Australia gets its fuel.
Key points •Australia heading towards 100 per cent fuel import dependency •Essential services to stop 'within a week' of disrupted supply •South China Sea tensions 'threaten' refined fuel imports
Retired Air Vice Marshall John Blackburn said Australia's food, water and medicine distribution was entirely reliant on transport fuel and the supply operated on a "just in time" philosophy for the sake of logistical efficiency.
Mr Blackburn, who is commissioned by the National Roads and Motorists' Association (NRMA) to provide consultancy and strategic advice on Australia's fuel security, said this unerring drive for market efficiency had led to four of the country's seven oil refineries closing down in three years.
"We're heading towards 100 per cent import dependency," Ret. Air Vice Marshall Blackburn said.
"But when the British were passing 40 per cent import dependency, they said they had a national security concern."
University of New South Wales Professor of International Security Alan Dupont agreed that Australia's growing dependency on imported fuel was "obviously a vulnerability".
"We don't have much in the way of refinery capacity in Australia right now and we don't have much in the way of strategic stock piles," he said.
"I think that dependency is only going to increase."
The South China Sea is a shipping route through which a large proportion of Australia's refined fuel is imported, including diesel, unleaded and jet fuel.
It is also emerging as a hot zone for potential conflict as China, the United States, Vietnam, Taiwan and the Philippines become increasingly invested in territorial disputes over islands in international waters.
Mr Blackburn said a scenario of conflict in the region and how it would affect Australia's fuel security was not considered in the Government's National Security assessment, "upon which the Energy White Paper (EWP) bases its assessment," Mr Blackburn said.
"The fundamental assumption they've made is because we haven't had a problem in 30 years, we're not going to have a problem."
With last year's EWP offering only brief discussion of the reliability of fuel imports, Mr Blackburn said he expected the Defence White Paper to look more "closely" at the issue.
Distribution of food, water and medicine 'would stop within days'
Engineers Australia (EA) told a 2015 Senate inquiry into the country's transport energy resilience and sustainability that Australia's total stockholding of oil and liquid fuel comprised two weeks of supply at sea, five to 12 days' supply at refineries, 10 days of refined stock at terminals and three days at service stations.
Australian fuel stockholding capability •Chilled and frozen goods delivery - 7 days •Dry goods - 9 days •Retail pharmacy supplies - 7 days •Hospital pharmacy supplies - 3 days •Petrol stations - 3 days National Roads and Motorists Association The NRMA said Australia only retained enough fuel in stockholdings to continue delivery of chilled and frozen goods for seven days, dry goods for nine days, hospital pharmacy supplies for three days, retail pharmacy for seven days, and petrol stations for three days.
This left Australia well short of its requirement as a member of the International Energy Agency (IEA) to maintain 90 days of fuel in reserve.
Mr Blackburn said a significant disruption to refined fuel imports, "the vast majority of which comes from south-eastern Asia", would start to bring the country to its knees "within a week".
"What's important is what type of fuel you've got and where, because we can't move fuel around Australia readily," he said.
If you had a major interruption of fuel input, defence would grind to a halt very quickly because you can't do anything.
Retired Air Vice Marshall John Blackburn
"We can't move by rail anymore because we don't have the rolling stock. We don't own ships anymore. And the trucks that move fuel are designed for 'just in time' normal commercial deliveries."
The Australian Institute of Petroleum (AIP) said on its website that Australia sourced 85 per cent of its refined fuel from across Asia and 58 per cent of its crude oil and feedstock from the Asia Pacific.
Some 21 per cent of crude oil came from Africa and 13 per cent from the United Arab Emirates in the Middle East.
Petrol, diesel and aviation were the dominant transport fuels used in Australia and in 2012-13 accounted for 90 per cent of its transport energy use.
AIP maintains that with refined fuel coming from 20 different countries and crude oil from 17, Australia's supply is diverse and flexible enough to respond to any emergency in supply and had done for decades.
The Australian Government last year agreed "in-principle" to return the country to compliance with the IEA 90-day holding requirement.
Its plan to add 40 days worth of fuel reserves, expected to cost several billion dollars over 10 years, is promised later this year.
But Mr Blackburn, who retired as deputy chief of the Air Force in 2008, said escalating tensions in the South China Sea meant a significant supply disruption could be closer to reality than people think.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2016 10:20:57 GMT 10
With out sounding sarcastic "Whats New"
|
|
shinester
Senior Member
China's white trash
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 3,578
Email: shiny@ausprep.org
|
Post by shinester on Feb 25, 2016 4:23:05 GMT 10
It's worse Oh and hardly anyone knows or cares about it. Us preppers look at that and go, 9 days of food delivery, can you imagine those 9 days? I'm glad I stocked up.
|
|
Frank
VIP Member
APF Life Member
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 2,739
Email: frank@ausprep.com
|
Post by Frank on Feb 25, 2016 8:21:26 GMT 10
www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-25/defence-white-paper-australian-army-to-receive-30-billion-boost/7197908 Australian military to receive $30 billion boost in long-awaited Defence White Paper Today's long awaited Defence White Paper will outline $30 billion of additional spending over the next 10 years, and also focus on strategic concerns linked to China's rapid military expansion.
The centrepiece of the white paper will be 12 new submarines to replace the Collins Class fleet, as well as big spending commitments on the Joint Strike Fighter project, new armoured vehicles and thousands of additional Australian Defence Force personnel.
In total the ABC has learnt there will be $29.9 billion in additional spending over the next 10 years, bringing the total defence budget to 2 per cent of GDP by 2023.
The Defence White Paper will come with a big sales pitch, but Australian taxpayers who fund the $32 billion annual defence budget can only hope it matches the hype. Defence sources say China will feature prominently, but the language used will not be dramatically different from what Australia has been saying publically about rising tensions in the South China Sea.
"China's going to remain our largest trading partner for a long time," Defence Department Secretary Dennis Richardson said on the eve of the document's release.
"Equally, it's important in respect of China to be forthright where you might have a difference, and we do have a difference in respect of activity in the South China Seas, and we have expressed that explicitly publically and will continue to do so."
In preparing today's document, Australian officials have held 200 meetings with foreign governments, including China's.
The continuing threat posed by Islamic State terrorists, and state-on-state conflicts such as the one involving Russia and Ukraine are also canvassed.
"I think there's a fair chance if you look ahead 20-30 years we could find ourselves going to places which we don't often talk about today," Mr Richardson said.
Figures inside the defence community say there will also be a big focus on cyber security, an area they say has become a much "bigger problem" since the last white paper.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 25, 2016 12:09:47 GMT 10
Why do they want new subs when the RAN do not have enough crews for the ones they have, even patrol boats are sitting idle for lack of crews!
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Feb 25, 2016 12:45:53 GMT 10
Why do they want new subs when the RAN do not have enough crews for the ones they have, even patrol boats are sitting idle for lack of crews! Because it's an easy way to justify spending money (not all of which - I'm sure - will actually end up where they say it will).
|
|
|
Post by Joey on Feb 25, 2016 14:37:53 GMT 10
Why do they want new subs when the RAN do not have enough crews for the ones they have, even patrol boats are sitting idle for lack of crews! Because it's an easy way to justify spending money (not all of which - I'm sure - will actually end up where they say it will). Yep one could expect around 5-20million of that to be wasted on "feasibility studies" for the individual projects.
|
|
tyburn
Senior Member
Posts: 366
Likes: 541
|
Post by tyburn on Feb 25, 2016 21:32:42 GMT 10
Because it's an easy way to justify spending money (not all of which - I'm sure - will actually end up where they say it will). Yep one could expect around 5-20million of that to be wasted on "feasibility studies" for the individual projects. Just enough money to buy votes in the manufacturing areas of SA and NSW I guess. I wonder if they have decided to spend a few billion on that fuel storage problem in the first article above, or has that been put back in the too hard basket?
|
|
|
Post by Peter on Feb 25, 2016 22:51:33 GMT 10
Of course the Greens are whining about money being spent on defence. If ISIS did build a dirty bomb the greens would probably offer to pay for shipping it here.
|
|
|
Post by Joey on Feb 26, 2016 4:15:10 GMT 10
Of course the Greens are whining about money being spent on defence. If ISIS did build a dirty bomb the greens would probably offer to pay for shipping it here. And then would offer to test their heroin purity before they on sell it to the bikie gangs
|
|
Frank
VIP Member
APF Life Member
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 2,739
Email: frank@ausprep.com
|
Post by Frank on Feb 26, 2016 8:46:27 GMT 10
A brief article on Chinas response to the White Paper. tyburn - any feeling on what the average Chinese person thinks of this or Australia or the South China Sea situation at the moment?
www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/military/china-cranky-over-aussie-defence-buildup/news-story/cdd25f55bad187e77d26f5bc6aa7f69e China cranky over Aussie defence build-up THE Chinese government has expressed “dissatisfaction” with Australia’s “negative” remarks on the South China Sea and its military development.
“We hope the Australian side can correctly and positively view China’s development and strategic intent,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said at a press briefing in Beijing yesterday.
Asked if China wanted to see an arms race in the region, Hua said: “The answer to that is definitely no”.
Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull had earlier in the day unveiled an ambitious new defence blueprint, with a warning that half the world’s submarines and advanced combat aircraft would be operating in the Indo-Pacific region in the next two decades.
“We would be concerned if the competition for influence and the growth in military capability were to lead to instability and threaten Australia’s interests, whether in the South China Sea, the Korean peninsula or further afield,” he said as he launched the new Defence White Paper.
The paper outlines a series of factors which will shape Australia’s strategic outlook out to 2035, especially the relationship between China and the US which will remain the pre-eminent global power over that period.
|
|
tyburn
Senior Member
Posts: 366
Likes: 541
|
Post by tyburn on Feb 26, 2016 17:53:52 GMT 10
None of my colleagues have said anything, although its usually the uneducated yobs (ie. taxi drivers) and middle-aged people who still think Mao is a god who are railing against the west. The thing is that if any other country ever says anything about China, they demand an apology, call in ambassadors, say that China's feelings have been hurt, demand people not interfere in China and act butthurt in general. When they tell other countries off though, then the shoe is on the other foot, and they are just doing the right thing in the eyes of many.
|
|
shinester
Senior Member
China's white trash
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 3,578
Email: shiny@ausprep.org
|
Post by shinester on Feb 29, 2016 9:24:45 GMT 10
I can't wait for the Chinese people to realize that the ruling class, the fat cats are the members of the communist party and the country implodes. It'll happen, just a matter of when.
|
|
tyburn
Senior Member
Posts: 366
Likes: 541
|
Post by tyburn on Feb 29, 2016 17:52:05 GMT 10
They know that the party members are mainly all corrupt, and instead of complaining, do their best to become one themselves! Meanwhile, although the party old guard from the 40s, 50s and 60s were vehemently against opening membership to "capitalist dogs", many of the tycoons nowadays are both party members and government representatives. There are already thousands of protests every year - they stopped reporting the figures a few years back when it hit a certain threshold - but internet censorship etc means that most people only learn about it through informal networks, word of mouth etc.
|
|