wolfstar
Senior Member
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 917
|
Post by wolfstar on Jan 16, 2014 13:41:15 GMT 10
this is well worth watching guys (if its in the wrong section please forgive me, i just figured this was a human caused incident)
|
|
sentinel
Senior Member
Posts: 463
Likes: 253
|
Post by sentinel on Mar 16, 2014 22:58:32 GMT 10
This was sent to me tonight.
I was told a few months ago that apparently we already have detected a signature in the GBR from that area.
And I hope no one is eating sushi anymore or miso soups or miso/wasabi pastes either?
|
|
remnantprep
Senior Member
People do not exist for the sake of governments!
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 3,968
Email: remnant@ausprep.org
|
Post by remnantprep on Mar 17, 2014 8:33:11 GMT 10
This was sent to me tonight. I was told a few months ago that apparently we already have detected a signature in the GBR from that area. And I hope no one is eating sushi anymore or miso soups or miso/wasabi pastes either? No haven't been eating fish either! Have decided to stock tinned chicken instead of things like Tuna.
|
|
sentinel
Senior Member
Posts: 463
Likes: 253
|
Post by sentinel on Mar 17, 2014 9:08:55 GMT 10
This was sent to me tonight. I was told a few months ago that apparently we already have detected a signature in the GBR from that area. And I hope no one is eating sushi anymore or miso soups or miso/wasabi pastes either? No haven't been eating fish either! Have decided to stock tinned chicken instead of things like Tuna. Oh - Chook in a tin!!!!!! There is something that screams 'That's so wrong!!!!'
(Have you seen the email of the Asian guy riding around villages collecting dead chooks - and the scenes of a mountain of dead chooks in a shed - morphing into other products?)
|
|
Big Ted
Senior Member
SO TIRED
Posts: 849
Likes: 807
|
Post by Big Ted on Mar 19, 2014 22:22:54 GMT 10
Chicken is simply a meat just like Beef or Lamb and you find both of them in a Tin preserved for years on end. What is it about chooken in a tin that bothers you? I eat it occasionally myself and always keep an amount in the pantry, never had any issues with it.
|
|
sentinel
Senior Member
Posts: 463
Likes: 253
|
Post by sentinel on Apr 4, 2014 6:30:20 GMT 10
Chicken is simply a meat just like Beef or Lamb and you find both of them in a Tin preserved for years on end. What is it about chooken in a tin that bothers you? I eat it occasionally myself and always keep an amount in the pantry, never had any issues with it. No real valid argument on this - just personal preference. (Just seems wrong to me) - Think if I had more confidence with labelling on what really goes in those cans and from what actual country it was manufactured in perhaps I would be more open to try it - I actually picked up a can 'once', in a supermarket intending to buy it and try it - just couldn't actually put it in my trolley. I have issue with the loose product labelling laws we have and how our legislation allows some countries access our market place through a back door process. Although the meats are edible - I still believe the labelling should be clear. If that can of 'Spam' contains internal animal organs - they should say so clearly on the pack. If it's grown/raised in China - it should be marketed as such and NOT as product of NZ or Canada. If you want to see a 'real grey area' look at Australia's legislation on bottled water.
|
|
krisb
Full Member
Posts: 65
Likes: 44
|
Post by krisb on Apr 4, 2014 12:19:40 GMT 10
Have researched and decided that Potassium iodide will be included in my preps eventually,not a huge price that could easily save all my loved ones lives.
|
|
Big Ted
Senior Member
SO TIRED
Posts: 849
Likes: 807
|
Post by Big Ted on Apr 4, 2014 19:09:16 GMT 10
I still believe the labelling should be clear. If that can of 'Spam' contains internal animal organs - they should say so clearly on the pack. If it's grown/raised in China - it should be marketed as such and NOT as product of NZ or Canada. Yes I most definately agree on that! Even though I love Spam, it's a surety that it contains more than what it adverts. Same goes for many other foods.
|
|
sentinel
Senior Member
Posts: 463
Likes: 253
|
Post by sentinel on May 7, 2014 19:33:52 GMT 10
(Sorry - my poor computer skills wouldn't allow me to copy the images/maps/graphs and such, I had enough trouble copying this info with links already in place). .............................................................
Nuclear Fuel Fragment from Fukushima Found in Europe The Nuclear Core Has Finally Been Found … Scattered All Over the World By Washington's Blog Global Research, May 06, 2014 Washington's Blog
Fukushima did not just suffer meltdowns, or even melt-throughs, It suffered melt-outs where the nuclear core of at least one reactor was spread all over Japan. In addition, the Environmental Research Department, SRI Center for Physical Sciences and Technology in Vilnius, Lithuania reported in the Journal of Environmental Radioactivity: Analyses of (131)I, (137)Cs and (134)Cs in airborne aerosols were carried out in daily samples in Vilnius, Lithuania after the Fukushima accident during the period of March-April, 2011.***The activity ratio of (238)Pu/(239,240)Pu in the aerosol sample was 1.2, indicating a presence of the spent fuel of different origin than that of the Chernobyl accident. (“Pu” is short for plutonium.) Fukushima is 4,988 miles from Vilnius, Lithuania. So the plutonium traveled quite a distance. Today, EneNews reports that a fuel fragment from Fukushima has been found in Norway: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Atmospheric removal times of the aerosol-bound radionuclides 137Cs and 131I during the months after the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident – a constraint for air quality and climate models, May 2012: Hot particles (particles that carry very high radioactivity, e.g., fragments of the nuclear fuel) were present in the FD-NPP plume. Elsevier (academic publisher) — Fukushima Accident: Radioactivity Impact on the Environment, Pavel P. Povinec, Katsumi Hirose, Michio Aoyama, 2013: Paatero et al. (2012) estimated that a significant part of the Fukushima-derived radioactivity is in hot particles from autoradiogram of a filter sample from 1 to 4 April 2011 at Mt. Zeppelin, Ny-Alesund, Svalbard. Poster for Alaska Marine Science Symposium (Arctic Ocean and Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands) — Fukushima fallout: Aerial deposition on the sea ice scenario and wildlife health implications to ice-associated seals, Jan. 20, 2014: Exposure to fallout while on ice in 2011[...] Models suggest pinnipeds may have been exposed while on ice to the following: [...]Hot particles, nuclear fuel fragments, were detected in air samples taken in Svalbard, Norway (Paatero et al. 2012). See also: Gundersen: This video “confirms our worst fears” — Scientist: Reactor core materials found almost 500 km from Fukushima plant — 40,000,000,000,000,000,000 Bq/kg — Can travel very, very significant distances — Hot particles found in 25% of samples from Tokyo and Fukushima (VIDEO) Fukushima is 10632 kilometers – or 6,606 miles -from Svalbard, Norway. Moreover, the distance is actually much further … because it took a circuitous route from Fukushima to Norway.As ENENews reports: (Paatero et al. 2012) Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, Airborne fission products in the High Arctic after the Fukushima nuclear accident: It is evident that the plume arriving in Svalbard did not come from Europe but directly from North America [...] [Hot particles are] either fragments of the nuclear fuel or particles formed by the interactions between condensed radionuclides, nuclear fuel, and structural materials of the reactor [...] Based on the total beta, 137Cs and 134Cs activity content [...] on the filter it can be estimated that a significant part of the activity related to Fukushima was in hot particles. So far the authors are not aware of any other reports concerning hot particles from the Fukushima accident. [...] the radionuclides emitted into the atmosphere were quickly dispersed around practically the whole northern hemisphere within a couple of weeks. In other words, the hot particles from Fukushima traveled to North American, and then to Europe. This is only logical.We noted 2 days after the 2011 Japanese earthquake and tsunami: The jet stream passes right over Japan. The jet stream was noticed in the 1920′s by aJapanese meteorologist near Mount Fuji, and the Japanese launched balloon bombs into the jetstream to attack America during WWII. (Indeed, U.S. nuclear authorities were very concerned about the West Coast getting hit by Fukushima radiation … but they covered it up.) So the Fukushima hot particles traveled from from Japan to the West Coast of North America … and then were carried by wind currents from there. Indeed, U.S. nuclear authorities were very concerned about the West Coast getting hit by Fukushima radiation … but they covered it up.) So the Fukushima hot particles traveled from from Japan to the West Coast of North America … and then were carried by wind currents from there. It’s approximately 5,000 miles from Fukushima to the closest part of North America. It’s another 4,298miles from San Francisco to Svalbard, Norway. So the hot particle traveled roughly 9,298 miles from Fukushima to Norway. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|