|
Post by SA Hunter on Aug 8, 2019 17:35:09 GMT 10
Thoughts??
|
|
|
Post by spinifex on Aug 8, 2019 18:12:18 GMT 10
Can't find a lot to disagree with in that list.
Number 8 always makes me laugh. Probably the better point to make is this: Just because you carry a pistol doesn't mean a pretty girl can't slash your femoral artery with a box cutter. Or a granny can't tempt you with poisoned food. Or a goat herder can't place an IED in the path of your vehicle.
Armaments only help once you have correctly identified a threat before drifting into its clutches. Not all threats are obvious.
|
|
blueshoes
Senior Member
Posts: 609
Likes: 700
Location: Regional Dan-istan
|
Post by blueshoes on Aug 8, 2019 18:26:09 GMT 10
He's mostly right, but the conclusion from what he says is essentially "be less sure what SHTF will look like"
Except for the point about railway sleepers, that probably applies to lots of the materials people try and build bunkers with and isn't directly to do with SHTF
|
|