Weather Channel Founder tells the truth on climate change

I realised the extent of the climate change hoax over the last 3 or 4 years when I studied up on UN Agenda 21. The problem is that people are being brainwashed and having rights taken away slowly - like the proverbial frog in a pot, they don't realise what's happening.

This is one not to get me started on...

Yes, the climate does change. It always has, it always will. Otherwise climate data would not deviate one iota from the statistical averages.

Some of the main problems (but by no means all of them) I have with the whole issue regarding what is currently termed "climate change" are:

- there is no evidence to suggest there is an actual problem - plants are growing better, crops are growing better, etc. The planet is looking after itself, just as it was designed to.
- the 1970's "global cooling" movement gave way to the recent "global warming" movement, and an 18 year stop in global warming has now led to the name "climate change" being used,
- those who bellow about it the most repeatedly demonstrate that their views are intrinsically linked to their support of a one world government
- the "cure" is always along the lines of increasing taxes and government power
- statistics used by these people are dubious at best (eg "97% of scientists agree"...) - you know, just like "everyone" used to know that the Sun orbited Earth, the Earth was flat, organisms reproduced by spontaneous generation, space flight wasn't possible, etc, etc, etc.
- supporters often claim that "the science is settled" - in other words, they don't want to reason or debate the science on its merits.
- they claim that the human population is to blame for everything and therefore must be reduced (yet none of these people volunteer themselves).

Keep it civil please, sheesh.

Climate change is one of those subjects, similar to religion, politics or weather toilet paper should be put on the roll on the wall side or on the outside. Everyone has an opinion, but there is no one definitive answer on the matter. The science of man made global warming/climate change swings both ways, from "yes we cause and can stop it" to "we have no impact".

What is known is that the climate is constantly changing, the earth is a constantly evolving and changing system. We wouldn't have had ice ages, massive warming periods, extinction events or any type of evolution if it wasn't.

My 2c worth, purely opinion, is that the climate is changing (as it has and forever will), we need to prepare and adapt to those changes as man has done for thousands of years. "Climate change" has been hijacked into a politcal issue and money making exercise which will not really help anyone.

Toilet paper should never be wall side, ARE YOU CRAZY!!!!!!!!

Actually WALL SIDE, helps to slow down the rate at which toilet paper unravels from the holder!!!!!

Ok from Wikipedia! I have highlighted the points that are relevant to my argument!


Arguments for over or under[edit]

The main reasons given by people to explain why they hang their toilet paper a given way are ease of grabbing and habit.[23] Some particular advantages cited for each orientation include:

Over reduces the risk of accidentally brushing the wall or cabinet with one's knuckles, potentially transferring grime and germs.[24]
Over makes it easier to visually locate and to grasp the loose end.[25]
Over gives hotels, cruise ships, office buildings, public places and homeowners with guest bathrooms the option to fold over the last sheet to show that the room has been cleaned.[26]
Over is generally the intended direction of viewing for the manufacturer's branding, so patterned toilet paper looks better this way.[27]
Under provides a tidier appearance, in that the loose end can be more hidden from view.[28][29]
Under reduces the risk that a toddler or a house pet, such as a dog or cat, will completely unroll the toilet paper when batting at the roll.[30]
Under in a recreational vehicle may reduce unrolling during driving.[31]

Partisans have claimed that each method makes it easier to tear the toilet paper on a perforated sheet boundary, depending on the direction of pulling and the use of a second hand to stabilize the roll.[32] (A traveller from the U.S. to China in 1991 noted a different setup: non-perforated paper with a metal cutter above the roll, which obliges the over direction.)[33]

It is unclear if one orientation is more economical than the other. The Centralian Advocate attributes a claim that over saves on paper usage to Planet Green.[34] A reader of The Orange County Register found a "six-month study" by a "university in the U.S." that came to the same conclusion.[35] But a reader of the Cape Argus wrote that a "British loo paper manufacturer" came to the opposite conclusion.[36] In his humor compilation How Hemlines Predict the Economy, Peter FitzSimons writes that placing the hanging flap against the wall "is generally twice as economical".[37]

In the academic field of evaluation, Michael Scriven writes that the question of the correct way to insert toilet paper is a "one-item aptitude test" for measuring one's evaluation skills. These skills include the evaluative attitude, practical logical analysis, empathy, teaching, and being a quick study. To prove one's competence, one may either derive the "one right answer" or prove that the test is or is not culturally biased.[38]

That's what I love about ausprep.com - a thread starts off discussing TEOTWAWKI because of climate change/politics, and ends up discussing bog roll installation.

ausprep.com, tackling the tough issues and prepping one roll at a time haha

Oh and.....back to climate change